The thing I most appreciated about this course it that it
took the concept of research from being something that other people do, and
turned it into something that I can do. If we want to be leaders, we need to
learn to identify things that need improvement in our schools. Once we have
identified something that needs improvement, we can take responsibility and
research ideas to implement change. In today’s world where there is so much
information available to us, we can take advantage of existing research, as
well as collect our own data, to determine ideas and solutions that we can
use.
My "light bulb" moment during this course was
during week 3 when the term "research project" suddenly went from
being a huge nebulous task to something understandable, interesting,
relevant, and most importantly, doable. The thing I most appreciated about this
course was being led, step-by-step, to that conclusion. I feel as if the
course was designed to help gently guide us to find a relevant project as
well as to understand the research process. I’m anxious to see if research
that I do will be able to make a difference in our school with our students,
and I’m already thinking ahead to other projects that we might be able to
undertake in the future.
I'm interested in learning more about how to share and
apply the results of action research. There are so many worthwhile and
competing goals in education, that having a great idea, even one supported by
research, isn't always enough to implement change. In order to learn more
about sharing effectively, I'm going to try to trust in the process we're
learning and go through what we have outlined, one step at a time. I need to
focus on completing my research first, so I have relevant data and research
to develop and support ideas for change. Then I will shift my focus to
learning and applying effective ways to communicate my findings and ideas.
One of my favorite quotes from the course was:
Nothing within a school has more impact upon students in
terms of skills development, self-confidence, or classroom behavior than the
personal and professional growth of their teachers…When teachers stop
growing, so do their students. Barth’s work (as cited in Dana,
2009, p. 32)
Barth succinctly states what I
have always believed, that it is important to be a life-long learner,
especially in rapidly-changing technology-related fields. However, I don’t
think I realized the impact that my continued growth would have on my
students, and I’m encouraged and provoked to press on.
Dana, N. F. (2009). Leading with Passion and
Knowledge. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin and American Association of
School Administration.
|
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
EDLD 5301 Reflections
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Draft Action Research Plan
|
Action Planning Template
|
||||
|
Goal: How
can we increase enrollment in Computer Science courses in CISD, especially
for women?
|
||||
|
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
1. Setting the
foundation.
Meet with site mentor
and campus Principal to discuss the importance of Computer Science (CS), and
the value of engaging young women in STEM courses.
|
Linda Woessner
Meet with
Mike Rhodes,
Sharolyn Overby
|
Nov 28 - Dec 2
|
Email,
Meeting times,
|
Completed meetings and
discussions.
|
|
2. Analyzing Data.
Research and collect
available resources to understand the status of CS Classes and enrolment in
CISD as compared to the State and National rates.
|
Linda Woessner
Coordinate with Chris
Stephenson from CSTA, among others
|
Dec 2 – Jan 2
(and ongoing)
|
Internet search of
available resources of all types. Discussion Groups. RSS.
|
Written summary of
information gathered. Numerical data compiled in charts and graphs wherever
possible.
|
|
3. Developing Deeper
Understanding. Survey the current student population to determine attitudes
towards CS. Compare differences in attitudes between male and female
students.
Continue to look for
current research.
|
Linda Woessner
Carroll Sr. High STEM
teachers
|
Conduct survey from
Jan 17 – 31.
Data analysis from Jan
31 – Feb 29.
|
On-line and paper
survey.
|
Completed survey by as
large a population as possible. Data summarized, analyzed, and broken down by
gender.
|
|
4. Engage in
self-reflection.
Examine CISD course
offerings and policies to determine if there are any ways to broaden the
appeal of CS courses for all students, especially females.
|
Linda Woessner
Mike Rhodes, Carroll
Sr. High Teachers
|
Feb 1 – Feb 29
|
School policy
descriptions, and course descriptions.
|
Written summary of
results.
|
|
5. Exploring
Programmatic Patterns. Begin to formulate ideas that could be implemented on
our campus to encourage increased participation in CS and STEM courses.
|
Linda Woessner
Discuss and receive input from Campus Decision Committee, Department Coordinators, and Guidance Department |
Feb 1 – 29, 2012
|
|
List of potential
ideas.
|
|
6. Determine
Direction.
Choose specific steps
to be taken.
|
Linda Woessner
Mike Rhodes
|
March 1 - 23
|
Resources dependent on
plan of action.
|
List of ideas we can
implement on our campus.
|
|
7. Taking Action.
Develop a written plan of action. Include the following: a)Promoting National
CSEdWeek to raise awareness of CS Education in the district and community.
b)Actively recruit during
course enrollment period, and
c)Rewrite CS course
descriptions
|
Linda Woessner
Coordinate with Campus
Webmaster, Publicity Department, and KDGN team.
|
CSEdWeek preparation
and planning: Nov 1, 2011 to Dec 10, 2011
Enrollment period: Jan
2012
|
Promotional Materials:
Posters, video
announcements, website updates, flyers, district email blast
|
Successful promotions
during the week of Dec 4 – 10, National CSEdWeek
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)